• Become a member
  • Log In
The Institution of Electronics
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Objectives
    • Our History
    • Governance of the Institution
  • The Electron Magazine
    • 2024
      • 2024 – Winter
      • 2024 – Spring
      • 2024 – Summer
      • 2024 – Autumn
    • 2025
      • 2025 – Winter
      • 2025 – Spring
      • 2025 – Summer
      • 2025 – Autumn
    • 2026
      • 2026 – Winter
      • 2026 – Summer
  • Members
    • Membership Grades and Fees
    • Members’ Resources
      • The Electron Newsletter
      • The Archives
  • Education and Projects
    • National Electronics Competition
    • Student Members’ Projects
    • Arkwright Engineering Scholarships
  • News
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu
Uncategorised

DPOT push up/down

Some folks prefer pushbutton switches to take effect on push instead of release. These buttons do that very thing.

I suppose it’s really just a matter of taste, but I’ve always liked momentary contact switches that act when you push them better than those that wait until you let go. It’s really an arbitrary thing, so I wouldn’t presume to criticize designs that choose the latter over the former, like this one from one of my favorite Design Idea contributors.

It’s not worse. Or better, for that matter. Just different. 

Wow the engineering world with your unique design: Design Ideas Submission Guide

In contrast to RJ’s design, Figure 1’s circuit implements my preferred method. It bumps DPOT U2’s setting by one count each time the UP button is pressed, and un-bumps it when DOWN is mashed.


Figure 1 This pushbutton-to-digital-potentiometer interface is optimal for impatient people.

Here’s how it works.

Pushing either button makes U1a’s pin 3 go high. Contact bounce is filtered out by R3C1’s ~5 ms time constant, and Schmidt trigger inverter U1d then delivers a single clean low-going transition to U2’s clock input. This makes U2’s wiper take one step up if its pin 2 is high (i.e., the UP button is pressed and DOWN isn’t) or one step down if  pin 2 is low (i.e., DOWN is down).

Other than that difference, there’s really no compelling reason to choose Figure 1 over RJ’s circuit. Figure 1’s parts count does include one fewer chip, but so what? They’re cheap.

But stay tuned for future developments that go-when-pushed makes possible, which might be more significant…

Stephen Woodward‘s relationship with EDN’s DI column goes back quite a long way. Over 200 submissions have been accepted since his first contribution back in 1974.  They have included best Design Idea of the year in 1974 and 2001.

Related Content

  • Push to increase, decrease a digital potentiometer
  • Keep Dpot pseudologarithmic gain control on a leash
  • Synthesize precision Dpot resistances that aren’t in the catalog
  • Op-amp wipes out DPOT wiper resistance
  • PWMpot approximates a Dpot

The post DPOT push up/down appeared first on EDN.

26 August 2026
http://institutionofelectronics.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IOE_LOGO.png 0 0 whdsolutions http://institutionofelectronics.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IOE_LOGO.png whdsolutions2026-08-26 13:59:252026-08-26 13:59:25DPOT push up/down

Latest news

  • Some tips for electrical engineers18 September 2026 - 13:08
  • FPGA architecture: SEU detection and recovery strategies18 September 2026 - 09:06
  • Highly integrated approach to power system design in the AI era17 September 2026 - 15:51
  • SFP: Add-in module delivers diminutive performance, flexibility17 September 2026 - 13:46
  • Pin-compatible MPUs simplify product variants17 September 2026 - 01:36
  • Anti-surge resistors reduce component count17 September 2026 - 01:36
  • SPAD sensor processes photon events on-chip17 September 2026 - 01:36
  • Transient voltage suppression devices reach 11 kW with flat clamping17 September 2026 - 01:36
  • Sensor sharpens infrared in-cabin imaging17 September 2026 - 01:36
  • FPGA architecture: Radiation particle types and single event upsets (SEUs)16 September 2026 - 14:25
IOE LOGO 2

Become a member

click here

Become a member

click here

Become a subscriber

click here

Become a sponsor

click here

© Copyright - The Institution of Electronics | Website by WHD Solutions
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
Link to: A 4-step guide to selecting PFC conduction mode: CrM/DCM vs. CCM Link to: A 4-step guide to selecting PFC conduction mode: CrM/DCM vs. CCM A 4-step guide to selecting PFC conduction mode: CrM/DCM vs. CCM Link to: SiC MOSFET relay switches up to 3300 V Link to: SiC MOSFET relay switches up to 3300 V SiC MOSFET relay switches up to 3300 V
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top