• Become a member
  • Log In
The Institution of Electronics
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Objectives
    • Our History
    • Governance of the Institution
  • The Electron Magazine
    • 2024
      • 2024 – Winter
      • 2024 – Spring
      • 2024 – Summer
      • 2024 – Autumn
    • 2025
      • 2025 – Winter
      • 2025 – Spring
      • 2025 – Summer
      • 2025 – Autumn
    • 2026
      • 2026 – Winter
      • 2026 – Summer
  • Members
    • Membership Grades and Fees
    • Members’ Resources
      • The Electron Newsletter
      • The Archives
  • Education and Projects
    • National Electronics Competition
    • Student Members’ Projects
    • Arkwright Engineering Scholarships
  • News
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu
Uncategorised

Nifty nulling of non-negligible dpot “scale” errors

This silly simple circuit cancels out potentially serious digital potentiometer zero- and full-scale errors.

Everybody (well, most everybody) knows that digipots tend to be more accurate when used as variable voltage dividers (i.e., in potentiometer mode) and not so much when used as variable resistors (in rheostat mode). In pot mode, many error-promoting effects like resistance element tolerances and temperature coefficients cancel out (well, mostly). But even when pots are used as actual pots, some small non-idealities might still sneak by. One (okay, two) of these are zero- and full-scale ratio errors.

Figure 1 shows a simple Dpot output buffer that should work fine when the error terms are small.


Figure 1 Dpot U1 runs in straightforward voltage-division potentiometer mode with unity-gain buffer A1 providing isolation from output loading. So everything should be nicely ideal with Vsigout = Vsigin(Rwa/Rba).

Unfortunately, sometimes the errors are not so small. For example, if U1 were an 8-bit (1/256) resolution MAX5451, then typical values for full-scale and zero-scale errors are listed in its datasheet as 8lsb = 3.1%, which makes the actual achieved accuracy look more like only 5 bits instead of the claimed 8.

Vsigout = Vsigin((Rwa/Rba)(1 – Fullscale) + (Rwb/Rba)(Zeroscale))
Fullscale = Zeroscale = 0.031 (typical)
Vsigout = Vsigin(Rwa/Rba) +/-3%

In any precision-critical application, those 3% offsets are likely to be unacceptable. Fortunately, Figure 2 suggests how a simple 3-resistor error-nulling fix is possible.


Figure 2 If R1 = R2 x (scale error) then the errors disappear and Vsigout = Vsigin(Rwa/Rba).

Here’s how it works. Note that, for best performance, R2 and R3 should equal each other to ~0.1% and R1 should be adjusted equal to R1 = ScaleErrorPercentage x R2. An easy way to accomplish this is as follows:

  1. Adjust U1 to its maximum UP setting. Then Rwa = Rba.
  2. Set SigIn = V+ – 100mV or so. The exact voltage isn’t critical; we’re just insuring that A1 won’t saturate.
  3. Connect a sensitive voltmeter between SigIn and SigOut.
  4. Adjust R1 to null the meter reading and force Vsigout = Vsigin.

Done.

In some applications, error cancellation might be good enough with R1 equal to a fixed value calculated from the datasheet figures, instead of needing post-assembly calibration. 31 kΩ, for example, would align with the MAX5451’s data.

Which might niftily null some non-negligible production costs.

Stephen Woodward‘s relationship with EDN’s DI column goes back quite a long way. Over 200 submissions have been accepted since his first contribution back in 1974.  They have included best Design Idea of the year in 1974 and 2001.

Related Content

  • DPOT push up/down
  • Finger-friendly DPOT pushbuttons do ups, downs, and dittos
  • Double DPOT programming: Parallel gang-up, singleton, or none
  • Digital potentiometer simulates log taper to accurately set gain
  • Push to increase, decrease a digital potentiometer
  • Synthesize precision bipolar Dpot rheostats

The post Nifty nulling of non-negligible dpot “scale” errors appeared first on EDN.

14 October 2026
http://institutionofelectronics.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IOE_LOGO.png 0 0 whdsolutions http://institutionofelectronics.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IOE_LOGO.png whdsolutions2026-10-14 13:14:332026-10-14 13:14:33Nifty nulling of non-negligible dpot “scale” errors

Latest news

  • Nifty nulling of non-negligible dpot “scale” errors14 October 2026 - 13:14
  • Apple heads Home: Distributed identity validation, and how much does Matter matter?14 October 2026 - 05:04
  • 5G chips and modules power phones, wearables, IoT, and vehicles13 October 2026 - 15:46
  • Measure the AC mains frequency with an ordinary counter13 October 2026 - 13:45
  • AI silicon tapeout: Can it beat a benchmark engineers trust?13 October 2026 - 04:37
  • The secret life of ferrite bead: More than just a lump on a wire12 October 2026 - 16:18
  • TP-Link’s Tapo P110M smart plug: Matter and energy monitoring matter12 October 2026 - 13:16
  • Measurement bandwidth9 October 2026 - 13:56
  • Practical design for a multi-output flyback converter with improved cross-regulation9 October 2026 - 08:50
  • The multi-gig Ethernet migration: Motivations and implementations8 October 2026 - 13:29
IOE LOGO 2

Become a member

click here

Become a member

click here

Become a subscriber

click here

Become a sponsor

click here

© Copyright - The Institution of Electronics | Website by WHD Solutions
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
Link to: Apple heads Home: Distributed identity validation, and how much does Matter matter? Link to: Apple heads Home: Distributed identity validation, and how much does Matter matter? Apple heads Home: Distributed identity validation, and how much does Matter...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top