• Become a member
  • Log In
The Institution of Electronics
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Objectives
    • Our History
    • Governance of the Institution
  • The Electron Magazine
    • 2024
      • 2024 – Winter
      • 2024 – Spring
      • 2024 – Summer
      • 2024 – Autumn
    • 2025
      • 2025 – Winter
      • 2025 – Spring
      • 2025 – Summer
      • 2025 – Autumn
    • 2026
      • 2026 – Winter
  • Members
    • Membership Grades and Fees
    • Members’ Resources
      • The Electron Newsletter
      • The Archives
  • Education and Projects
    • National Electronics Competition
    • Student Members’ Projects
    • Arkwright Engineering Scholarships
  • News
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu
Uncategorised

How Precise Must We Be?

To how many significant digits does Pi (and its peers) remain relevant?

Some while ago, I downloaded a file of Pi calculated to one-hundred-thousand digits. A bit later, I downloaded a different file of Pi calculated to one million digits. I thought those were impressive, but just recently I read of a computer calculation of the value of Pi made to an insanely larger number of digits. I can’t find that article again but from memory, the calculation was run to two trillion digits.

The goal wasn’t to seek the value of Pi itself to that level of precision. It was a test of the computer, to see if it could run long enough to do that calculation without some kind of malfunction coming up. It was a test of the computer’s ability to run through very long computational processes without error. In that article, reference was made to NASA depending on the value of Pi to merely fifteen digits. This seeming disparity merited a look-see.

I looked up the definition of a parsec and found its numerical value in light years to a lot of significant digits, fourteen to be truthful. I then set up the geometry on which that number was based (Figure 1).


Figure 1 This graphic provides a visual definition of a parsec.

As the earth moves around the sun, a far-off object is observed for its apparent position in the sky. Because of parallax, there is an angular shift of that apparent position at earth’s two orbital extremes. Knowing the radius of earth’s solar orbit, half of that angular shift is taken as an angle which I call theta for which the distance to that object from the center of the sun may be calculated. The implicit assumptions are that the earth’s orbit is circular and that the sun is at the center of that circle which we know is not exactly so, but we do that anyway.

When the value of theta is one arc second or one degree divided by 3600, the distance D is defined as one parsec. Table 1 derives (with some admitted finagling which I will describe shortly) the distance of one parsec in terms of light years.


Table 1 The calculation detailed here derives parsecs in terms of light years.

The finagling part here is twofold. First, I used a value of Pi to fifteen significant digits, thus mimicking NASA. Secondly, I set the radius of earth’s solar orbit to precisely that value which yields the published value of one parsec that I found online.

That orbital radius looks just about right, but just how precise these numbers really are eludes me. For example, do we really know the earth’s orbital radius to that many significant digits? Earth’s orbit is not really circular. It is slightly elliptic. What precise refinements were made to establish the published value of D to so many significant digits? I have no idea.

Colloquially however, the value of one parsec is usually taken as 3.26 light years, which is good enough for general reading and good enough to satisfy my own curiosity. I’m perfectly happy with that fifteen digit value of Pi.

John Dunn is an electronics consultant and a graduate of The Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn (BSEE) and of New York University (MSEE).

Related Content

    • Successive approximation
    • Delta-sigma demystified: Basics behind high-precision conversion

The post How Precise Must We Be? appeared first on EDN.

29 May 2026
http://institutionofelectronics.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IOE_LOGO.png 0 0 whdsolutions http://institutionofelectronics.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IOE_LOGO.png whdsolutions2026-05-29 13:31:532026-05-29 13:31:53How Precise Must We Be?

Latest news

  • Radon: Level detection, risk determination, and as-needed mitigation13 August 2026 - 13:16
  • TI a first mover in CAN XL transceivers13 August 2026 - 10:13
  • Four-channel USB-UART IC boosts server management13 August 2026 - 05:08
  • eFuse speeds overcurrent detection13 August 2026 - 05:08
  • Memory platform tackles AI bottlenecks13 August 2026 - 05:08
  • 6.5-kV SiC MOSFET reaches 8-kV blocking13 August 2026 - 05:08
  • Made by Google 2026: This limited silicon-supply situation really sucks13 August 2026 - 05:08
  • Cheap and cheerful LMC555 RC PWM pulse generator12 August 2026 - 13:56
  • Record high wafer shipments. Can fabs keep pace?12 August 2026 - 07:51
  • Analog uncertainty-aware design: How it replaces Monte Carlo with certifiable yield intelligence11 August 2026 - 16:31
IOE LOGO 2

Become a member

click here

Become a member

click here

Become a subscriber

click here

Become a sponsor

click here

© Copyright - The Institution of Electronics | Website by WHD Solutions
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
Link to: 5 takeaways from Samsung Foundry’s design tie-up with Synopsys Link to: 5 takeaways from Samsung Foundry’s design tie-up with Synopsys 5 takeaways from Samsung Foundry’s design tie-up with Synopsys Link to: From AI silicon observability to governed evidence Link to: From AI silicon observability to governed evidence From AI silicon observability to governed evidence
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top