• Become a member
  • Log In
The Institution of Electronics
  • Home
  • About us
    • Our Objectives
    • Our History
    • Governance of the Institution
  • The Electron Magazine
    • 2024
      • 2024 – Winter
      • 2024 – Spring
      • 2024 – Summer
      • 2024 – Autumn
    • 2025
      • 2025 – Winter
      • 2025 – Spring
      • 2025 – Summer
      • 2025 – Autumn
    • 2026
      • 2026 – Winter
  • Members
    • Membership Grades and Fees
    • Members’ Resources
      • The Electron Newsletter
      • The Archives
  • Education and Projects
    • National Electronics Competition
    • Student Members’ Projects
    • Arkwright Engineering Scholarships
  • News
  • Contact Us
  • Menu Menu
Uncategorised

Taillight design that nearly halves system cost

Lately, nearly all automotive lighting features have been developed using LEDs, offering increased brightness while consuming less power. LEDs offer numerous benefits compared to conventional fluorescent bulbs. For the automotive taillight, all vehicles must have the following light functions:

TAIL(RED)
STOP(RED)
TURN (RED or Yellow)
BACKUP (white)

Wow the engineering world with your unique design: Design Ideas Submission Guide

Without compromising on the regulatory requirements of the taillight in some applications, we can combine one or more of these functions together in order to reduce the overall system cost.

For example, the TAIL light can be combined with the STOP light provided that the brightness difference between these two functions are evident whenever activated such that:

When the TAIL function is activated, the LEDs shall be driven with a lower brightness.
When the STOP function is activated, the LEDs shall be of higher brightness to differentiate the TAIL function.
When both functions are activated, STOP will have priority over TAIL.

The limitations for combining both the TAIL and STOP LED functions are as follows:

Each function requires a different brightness.
There is no communication bus from the BCM to the rear light module to convey function information.

We can overcome the limitations above using a simple sense circuit that enables using single group of LEDs for both the TAIL and STOP function as well as a single LED driver with variable LED current for adjusting the brightness as shown in Figure 1. This will reduce the system cost by almost 50%.

Figure 1 A simple sense circuit and an LED driver to control only a single group of LEDs for both the TAIL and STOP functions of a standard automotive taillight.

In this sample application circuit:

VBAT min: 9 V
VBAT max: 1 6V

The LEDs used are the OSRAM KR DMLN31.23 Red LEDs. A total of 10 LEDs are used in a single string where:

Total VF min: 2.0*10 = 20 V
Total VF max: 2.6*10 = 26 V

The LED driver employed is the MAX20090ATP used as a Boost controller for driving the LEDs where:

LED TAIL function current: 100 mA
LED STOP function current: 200 mA

Note both TAIL and STOP will be driven by the BCM/E-Fuse module from vehicle. Figure 2 is an image of the prototype driving and LED board with voltage probes measuring TAIL PWR, STOP PWR, and LED PWR. 

Figure 2 Test circuit driving and LED board with probes measuring TAIL PWR, STOP PWR, and LED CURRENT. 

In the circuit both TAIL PWR and STOP PWR are combined using reverse protection diodes. By default, when TAIL PWR alone is applied, the LED driver will be configured to drive 100mA of string current. When STOP PWR is being applied, transistor Q2 will be activated and Q1 will be disabled, this will change the voltage on the ICTRL pin of MAX20090 which in turn, changes the LED string current to 180mA (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Voltage and current graph where the LED functions (TAIL or STOP) automatically change the LED string current using FETs Q1 and Q2. This in turn enables the feature of using a single LED driver for both the TAIL and STOP functions instead of individual drivers, saving ~50% design cost.

The above circuit proves that, by using the MAX20090 along with transistor switching circuits (Q1, Q2, R9, and R10) we can use a single LED driver for driving both TAIL and STOP functions.

Rajesh Subramanyam (Senior Member, IEEE) received his bachelor’s degree in electrical and electronics engineering from Anna University, Chennai, India. He currently works as a senior hardware design engineer at an EV company in California, USA with a core expertise in automotive infotainment controller hardware design. Rajesh is also a member of the editorial review board for the SAE international journal.

 

Selvakumar Sonai (Senior Member, IEEE) received his master’s degree in microelectronics from BITS Pilani, India. He currently works as a senior hardware design engineer at an EV company in California, USA with a core expertise in automotive infotainment controller hardware design. Sonai is a member of IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems as well as the editorial review board for the SAE internal journal.

 

Logesh Sekar (Senior Member, IEEE) received his bachelor’s degree in electrical and electronics engineering from Anna University, Chennai, India He currently works as a senior hardware design engineer at an EV company in California, USA with a core expertise in automotive infotainment controller hardware design. Sekar is also a member of the editorial review board for the SAE international journal.

 

Related Content

LED tail lights
Lighting technology for the modern automobile
The headlights and turn signal design blunder
Headlights and turn signals, part two
Automotive lighting design considerations–LEDs

<!–
googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-native’); });
–>

The post Taillight design that nearly halves system cost appeared first on EDN.

6 September 2023
http://institutionofelectronics.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IOE_LOGO.png 0 0 http://institutionofelectronics.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IOE_LOGO.png 2023-09-06 15:32:342023-09-06 15:32:34Taillight design that nearly halves system cost

Latest news

  • Cheap and cheerful LMC555 RC PWM pulse generator12 August 2026 - 13:56
  • Record high wafer shipments. Can fabs keep pace?12 August 2026 - 07:51
  • Analog uncertainty-aware design: How it replaces Monte Carlo with certifiable yield intelligence11 August 2026 - 16:31
  • Automotive low side output switch architecture suitable for 8 to 48 volt buses and beyond11 August 2026 - 13:26
  • Inference 2.0: How enterprise AI is reshaping AI system architectures11 August 2026 - 07:19
  • Dissecting third-party camera batteries, part 2: Swelling10 August 2026 - 14:00
  • Component and layout rules for USB-C, PD, and CMTI10 August 2026 - 07:53
  • Bear on a power pole7 August 2026 - 13:46
  • Why software-defined systems require a dynamic data layer7 August 2026 - 10:42
  • Paper-based passives show impact of re-thinking substrate6 August 2026 - 16:22
IOE LOGO 2

Become a member

click here

Become a member

click here

Become a subscriber

click here

Become a sponsor

click here

© Copyright - The Institution of Electronics | Website by WHD Solutions
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to X
Link to: Disassembling an OBD-II scanner Link to: Disassembling an OBD-II scanner Disassembling an OBD-II scanner Link to: Tiny PCIe 4.0 SSD fits in-vehicle systems Link to: Tiny PCIe 4.0 SSD fits in-vehicle systems Tiny PCIe 4.0 SSD fits in-vehicle systems
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top